EVE V Display Question (PWM?)

Hello Eve Community!

With great impatience I am expecting release of a potentially better 2-in-1 device to the market.

Quite a long time I’m chose between different 2-in-1 devices, but after announcement EVE V, I decided to buy your device.

Earlier I was planning to buy MS SP4, but I refused from buying it as soon as I’ve found out SP4 has started to use PWM. (Microsoft Surface Pro 4 (Core m3) Tablet Review - NotebookCheck.net Reviews you can check display and comments section)

(left: USE PWM, right doesn’t )

In the past I worked with many different monitors, and long use monitor with PWM leading to eye strain, headache etc.
(Flicker-Free - BenQ VA LED Monitor GW2760HS - YouTube little explaining about PWM thing)

Thereby I’d like to know from Eve team and prototype testers information about the EVE V screen.
(PWM might be checked at home with simple pencil test. PWM Flickering on LCD - GSM and Pen Test [Full HD] - YouTube LG 29MA73V-PZ "R" pencil test (карандашный тест) - YouTube Dell UltraSharp U2311H - PWM Flickering (pen demonstration) - YouTube )

Does Eve V use PWM or not?

1 Like

Here’s what i found about it in the FAQ:


Actually, pretty much all digital to analog converters use PWM :slight_smile: In order to adjust the brightness, you need to either get a different voltage (which would require complicated electronics and also result in several steps of brightness instead of freely adjustable slider) or use PWM. In the latter case, it’s important to know that the higher the frequency is, the harder it is to notice the flicker. For example, CRTs used 50Hz or a similar value as their refresh rate, depending on the region they were made for. Essentially, their refresh rate was their flicker rate because they would only light up once per frame. It is tiring to look at a CRT, but it’s already hardly noticeable. Now, modern LCDs flicker in many times higher frequency so it really isn’t noticeable and doesn’t cause nearly as much eye strain. When using my prototype I didn’t notice any discomfort. My desktop monitor, for example, does cause a headache after a full day of using it, but V didn’t do that. Except when I (foolishly) used it at full brightness. It’s really too bright.


It’s hilarious that brightness in this case is too much while so many reviewers want more brightness on their devices. :slight_smile: At least in this case you can lower the brightness :wink:


Well, I don’t really have a problem with my W700, so I guess I’m not like those reviewers :smiley: We just don’t have sunny days often here…


I hope smth changed since faq was created.

If use pwm still confirmed, I’d like to know under which brightness settings it appears (90%, 60 %…).

Maybe we could use little trick, set brightness settings on X% and adjust brightness from driver.


P.S. Sorry but this isn’t solve my question. I need some “numbers”, maybe video like in example in first post.

1 Like

@Mike see if you can ask the engineers

You have managed to mix 3 different things together. CRTs used a higher refresh rate than regular LCDs use, but despite the higher refresh rate the effect was unpleasant due to the fact that the CRT image was created pixel after pixel, so a horizontal frequency was added to the mix. LCDs display the whole picture at once, so a LCD common panels refreshes at 60 Hz. PWM started to be an issue with LED backlights as LEDs are very fast in changing from on to off (so it is more of a shock to the eye) as compared with tube base backlight because that was slower in stopping to emit light, so the transition was softer.
PWM in the Vs display may be a valid concern as we have a quite strong/bright backlight, which means that for usual use you wont be running the backlight at 100 %. Now, the negative effect of PWM gets worse the longer the off cycle is, so the lower you set the brightness. And as said with Vs backlight be so bright, using it far below 100% will be common.
I agree with @Lbtv here that we should get the specs from the engineers. @Mike


Well, CRTs did refresh the image 50 times a second. Yes, LCDs do refresh it at 60Hz, but if we’re talking of PWM brightness regulation, we’re talking about a much more frequent refresh without actually updating the image. It just blinks the backlight many times per frame to reduce brightness.

That is true, but as I said, the faster that flicker is, the lesser the problem :wink:

1 Like

Please don’t write about 50hz. Even TCO’95 recommended 75hz refresh rate, and for convenient work usually used 85 and 100hz. 50hz is only suitable for torture of prisoners. :grin:


Well, I was talking about really old CRTs… Those that used the electric distribution’s frequency as their clock. Like, in Europe we have 220V/50Hz :stuck_out_tongue: in the US it’s 60Hz…

Anyway, my point is that not all PWM is bad. And there is no other way to change brightness, at least that I know of… Just take a look at this as an example:
Analog dimming is possible, but do we want a potentiometer knob sticking out of our Vs? :smile:

As I said, the higher frequency they use, the shorter the non-lit “gaps” become so they’re harder to notice. I don’t have any numbers specifically about V’s display, but PWM shouldn’t inherently be interpreted as “bad”.


It looks like the Lenovo Miix 720 doesn’t have PWM

Then how does it change brightness? :expressionless:

DC voltage control maybe. But that’s effectively using the same power as the display on 100% and just makes the energy that doesn’t go into brightness become heat. Not a solution for mobile systems if you ask me and I doubt Lenovo thinks this is the way to go either.

@xDrako any sources or further info on this?

AFAIK there are no freely adjustable voltage regulators between 100 different levels (for each percentage)… I might be wrong though… It’s quite easy to implement it with PWM though, you just calculate the on/off intervals required to achieve the brightness you need.

It’s possible that I’ve misunderstood something :innocent:

I don’t know :grin:

Here Notebookcheck

If you’re referring to the table where the Miix doesn’t have a value for PWM frequency I’m guessing they just don’t have that data, the space below is also blank. I’d be quite surprised if it doesn’t use PWM and intrigued what they use instead :slight_smile:

1 Like

They have tested it for screen flickering and the result was

PWM not detected

Frankly, I would interpret the “PWM not detected” statement as the frequency being too high to be measured by their equipment while basically that technology may be (or likely is) used. :wink:


People are often misusing the PWM term. They just use it to describe tiring flickering, or one visible with bare eyes. In reality, pretty much all monitors use PWM and nobody really has a problem with that, as long as the frequency is high enough.